Tuesday, August 10, 2010

The reply to Scott

Originally posted here showing David's reply to Scott's message.

Scott Rachui

Scott Rachui Here is my latest reply to David. And I'm not offering these in order to embarrass David or gossip. I just want you guys to all know that I'm just as upset about what he said as any of you are and to let you know that Christians do NOT accept or condone this type of behavior. I am so sorry for anyone's having to deal with madness like this.



    • Scott Rachui
      Message #1 from David:

      Hi Scott. I totally understand. Just so you know, I have absolutely no anger issues. I sent that to Tommy desperate for them to leave me alone and I quickly apologized to him after sending it.

      =============================
      Message #2 from David:

      I have removed you as admin and officer. If FB allowed me, I would close the group; unfortunately, as with pages, it does not. Also, I shut the group down because Laurie Ann expressed concerns to Duane because the atheists had become so vile. So, Duane told me that perhaps it should be shut down. So, I consulted you all and you all agreed. At your request, I first allowed you time to retrieve some of your discussions. As soon as you told me that you had retrieved them, I closed the group.

      =============================
      Message #3 from David:

      Futhermore, you might be interested to know that I have never once in my life iniated a single physical fight with a single person ever in my life. Furthermore, I don't even own a 45 or any other firearm or weapon of desctruction. Further still, the few times that I have undergone firearm training, I failed so miserably that I didn't earn my ribbon. Believe me, I am not a violent person and have never been.

      =============================
      My response (only one...and it's probably one of the shortest things I've ever written!)

      David, I understand that you can say anything today that you need to say in order to try and mitigate the words you used previously. But I've seen the screenshot of your comments and they were vile. There was nothing about them that sounded remotely like you were just trying to get someone to leave you alone. You said you were serious and you knew where Tommy lived, and even when Tommy said he'd show your comments to his wife in case he was killed, all you said was that he should definitely do that.

      That's hardly the comment of someone who is only trying to get someone to leave them alone. I urge you to please seek help, David. Even if your comments were merely words and you had no intention behind them, the fact that you would use such comments is such that you have no business going into the ministry until your issues are thoroughly address and resolved.

      we'll all be praying for you, David. But none of us can condone or associate with that sort of behavior. It's wrong on too many levels to even begin describing.
      See More

    • Tommy Garrett He only uses the ministry to gain control over others. DO NOT BELIEVE HIS LIES. He is more wicked than you can imagine.

    • Tommy Garrett Do you like how he started out by saying "I have absolutely no anger issues." text book sociopath.

    • Edward Shornock
      ‎//I have removed you as admin and officer. If FB allowed me, I would close the group; unfortunately, as with pages, it does not. Also, I shut the group down because Laurie Ann expressed concerns to Duane because the atheists had become so vile.//

      Heh....he lied right there.

      I'd close it, but I can't.

      Then..I closed PFAA because...haha..


    • Stacey Marie So now do you want a cigar?

    • Andrew Sarginson
      I obviously have not followed this like everyone else so was shocked when the ride ended. But David seemed ok to me and redefined the site more to my liking.......but above all i think we should all move on.

      Like all good things, it must come to an end (not quite the devastation though, when as a youngling 'Hill Street Blues' ended)

    • Scott Rachui I don't smoke, but thanks. No, the only reason I'm making this public is because I don't want anyone on here to think that Christians accept or condone such statements as David made. I'd rather not have to be so public in my rebuke of him, but given that this is already quite public, I want everyone to know which side I stand on.

    • Scott Rachui Ha! I'm glad I'm not the only one who was devastated when Hill Street Blues ended, Andrew! One of the best shows ever!

    • Steve Longden Scott could you ask David if it was his wife that contacted me or was it a troll . I was quite sympathetic with her yet I don't wish to be like that if it's a troll or that fool Rick . Thanks

    • Danna Gaddy
      ‎//Also, I shut the group down because Laurie Ann expressed concerns to Duane because the atheists had become so vile. So, Duane told me that perhaps it should be shut down. So, I consulted you all and you all agreed.//

      This posses me off even more. That wet fart got Laurie to tattle on the mean old Atheists...even though it was the goddamn crusty turds from that gay bashing protect marriage site who had become so vile. Oh god this makes me so mad!

      You fucking xians were so dominated by us...so emasculated...that you wanted that group shut down. How pathetic are god's warriors?


    • Diss Coe Bingo Edward! You picked up on the same thing I did!

    • Edward Shornock
      I'm astonished that he lied to you RIGHT THERE, Scott. He can't even be truthful with YOU.

      He said he CANNOT CLOSE IT because groups, like pages, cannot be closed. If he can't tell the truth about such a SIMPLE thing, with what can he be believed?

      And WHY is he creating NEW PAGES??


    • Neil Gough Scott, my estimation of you has increased immeasurably.
      Well done and well said Sir.

      As for closing the page after discussion and allowing us to save threads.
      I missed that memo.

    • Neil Gough Ooooo new pages Ed? Link please.

    • Scott Rachui When he asked me about shutting the site, I asked him to wait until I had the chance to grab one conversation. Then, I remembered I had it so i told him to go ahead. It wasn't handled well, but as Andrew says it's a done deal now.

    • Neil Gough I agree it is a done deal but do you see the esential unfairness that only Xians were consulted and only Xians were given the chance to retrieve stuff?

    • Neil Gough Thankyou Ed.

    • Scott Rachui I agree...it was unfair. There should have been a general notice. In fact, someone should start a site called "Pray for an Atheist" now that it's available!

    • Scott Rachui OK, so I did laugh at that when I got there. But it's likely not the type of site I'll frequent. Good luck with it, though! :-)

No comments:

Post a Comment